The Mexico–United States boundary is a transnational boundary that runs from the Pacific Ocean in the west to the Gulf of Mexico in the eastern. The boundary runs through a range of landscapes, from metropolitan regions to desert regions. With over 350 million recorded crossings every year, Mexico–United States boundary is the largest commonly traversed boundary in the universe. It is the globe’s 10th lengthy boundary separating two nations. The boundary has rarely proven tranquil. Over centuries, a location has been exposed to hostility and susceptible to strife. The Mexicans see the location as a daily reflection of their struggle. While border activities are intended to prevent illegal migrations, dangers to country safety, and illegal international activity, existing frontier activities have overstretched their approaches. They have not merely discouraged migration but have also resulted in the tragic fatalities of the immigration populace, which includes females, males, and their kids. Safeguard and Hold the Line activities have culminated in perilous border entry techniques, resulting in inevitable fatalities. Despite endangering the lives of these immigrants, these activities have been unsuccessful in preventing the unauthorized influx of immigration into the Us. They have boosted trafficking levels, escalated brutality and instability along the border, and fostered abuses of both civic and humanitarian liberties.
El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala are among the nations affected by the US-Mexico borderline crisis. Several people originate from these three nations and access the United States through the southern boundary. Numerous people from Central American nations crowd the US-Mexico border. Around the points of entrance, immigrants are being arrested. The crisis, nevertheless, is not about the number of immigrants but about the inadequacy of the U.S. government to react in an organized, effective, and humane approach in the framework of U.S. constitutional obligation and the number of people seeking shelter. Several governmental actions have exacerbated the issue. Asylum applicants are compelled to await across the boundary while their cases are heard. Metering is a tactic that has reduced the number of immigrants handled by border agents. In addition, the authorities have limited the number of persons who will be awarded refuge from Mexico. There is a conflicting perception that those who are victims of criminal or domestic assaults are ineligible for refuge in the United States.
Several measures to safeguard the US-Mexico boundary from undocumented immigrants have resulted in the creation of a military zone. Boundary militarization further restricts the applicability of transnational jurisdiction and constitutional ideas in the United States. The drive to secure the southern boundary has had a variety of disastrous effects, including an upsurge in the number of immigrants dying as a result of violations of both their humanitarian and constitutional liberties. Furthermore, the situations created to increase the possibility of conflict between border people and immigrants. According to one survey, almost 6 million people reside along the US-Mexico border. As a result, when such people’s liberties are infringed, it affects both U.S. nationals, legitimate inhabitants and travelers, as well as illegal immigrants and inhabitants (U.S.- Mexico border policy Report, 2008). According to one assessment published in 2007 by the Border Network for Human Rights (BNHR), 40 percent of verified breaches in Texas and the New Mexico border happened against lawful inhabitants and nationals of the Us (U.S.- Mexico border policy Report, 2008). 47 % of humanitarian liberties breaches were claimed to have been committed towards illegal immigrants, with 13 % committed towards individuals of uncertain status (U.S.- Mexico border policy Report, 2008). As a result, border security procedures and regulations violate the humanitarian liberties of inhabitants and families, regardless of their lawful position.
Furthermore, the operations of vigilante groups result in preventable fatalities. s. As a consequence, the majority of immigrants were compelled to take perilous ways into the U. S. Those routes include desolate desert locations and rugged landscapes and are used when the temperatures are perhaps too hot or too cold. Moreover, in order to avoid detection by regulators, migrants have been compelled to resort to perilous smuggling methods. Because of border inspections and the surveillance of their operations, most migrants are compelled to engage in hazardous actions such as concealing themselves in trucks in order to pass boundaries quickly. Nevertheless, these traffickers are unconcerned about the wellbeing of the people they convey. As a result, the vast majority of people have perished as a result of their shady methods of crossing the border into the United States. The vulnerability to arid temperatures and the extreme frequency of thirst they are compelled to tolerate are frequently the sources of mortality. It is believed that 400 migrants perish each year as a result of using these modes of transport (US-Mexico border policy Report, 2008).
In addition to the problems that individuals confront while traversing the border, they must depend on the assistance of coyotes, often known as human traffickers. Traffickers take advantage of migrants and attempt to abuse them as a result of their necessity for passage. According to one survey, 90 percent of all unauthorized immigrants who utilize traffickers for transport must pay a cost of $1,600 for a one-way trip (U.S.- Mexico border policy Report, 2008). It is tragic that, notwithstanding their exorbitant expenses, the immigrants are subjected to life-threatening circumstances, resulting in their early death. As if that weren’t much, the traffickers sexually abuse the female immigrants. When they are unable to repay their obligations, most women immigrants have their liberties infringed through forceful acts, assault, and being forced into slavery. Notwithstanding a number of regulations implemented by the U.S. administration to curb trafficking, these actions are insufficient to counteract the smuggling effects.
The militarization of the boundary has resulted in an increase in vigilantes. Vigilantes are civil-military forces known in their society as migrant seekers. Existing vigilante organizations along the US-Mexico border include the Minutemen, armed ranchers, and the American patrol (Dunn, 1996). These vigilante organizations are claimed to have assaulted individuals attempting to enter the Us through desert passages (Palafox, 2000). This crisis spurred an inquiry by the American Civil Liberties Union, which discovered a frightening number of concerns related to vigilantes. Migrants, for example, have claimed being attacked by animals, gunned at, beaten, ridiculed, and sometimes illegally detained at the Mexican border (Dunn, 1996).
Racial stereotyping is another crisis that could spark a constitutional liberties public protest. Because of their outward appearance, most Hispanic people have had to contact authorities who have questioned their legal eligibility (Andreas, 1998). This situation appears to be on the upswing along the Mexican border, where border authorities are aggressively threatening migrant populations. The routine roadblock resulted in drivers being questioned about their immigration eligibility, with the majority of those impacted being persons from low-income regions. It is not by chance that border security agents undertake transportation searches in areas densely inhabited with Latino migrants (Dunn, 1999a). Vulnerable areas are typically those where inhabitants will have to rely on public transportation.
Analyzing the aforementioned difficulties, it is apparent that people residing along the Mexican-US border are handled unfairly. In most situations, the activities to which individuals are subjected violate both their constitutional and humanitarian liberties. Various measures should be implemented to guarantee that populations are handled properly and justifiably, thereby minimizing the onset of a new civil age. Migrants and activists for fundamental rights may be forced to engage in conflict as a result of weak migration humanitarian laws at the US-Mexico border. Complaints over improper migration and social policies concerns at the border may lead to crisis. The majority of the social measures adopted to protect the safety of the US-Mexico border are incompatible with folk’s fundamental and civic rights, particularly those of immigrants. This had resulted in disastrous border activities such as vigilante attacks and border militarism, among other things. To guarantee the safeguarding of civic and humanitarian liberties, it is critical that advocated immigration regulation reforms such as punishing vigilante organizations and taking into account human dignity of existence be implemented.
References
Andreas., P. (1998). U.S. Immigration Control Offensive: Constructing an Image of Order on the Southwest Border. Marcelo Suarez-Orozco (ed.), Crossings: Mexican Immigration in Interdisciplinary Perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dunn, T. (1996, July 17). Book review the militarization of the U.S.‐Mexico border, 1978‐1992: Low‐intensity conflict doctrine comes home. | American Journal of sociology: Vol 102, no 5. American Journal of Sociology.
Dunn, T.J. (1999a). Border Enforcement and Human Rights Violations in the Southwest. Christopher G. Ellison and W. Allen Martin (eds.), Race and Ethnic Relations in the United States: Readings for the 21st Century. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing: 443-451
Jose Palafox. (2000, January 20). Opening Up Borderland Studies: A Review of U.S.-Mexico Border Militarization Discourse. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29767231
U.S.-Mexico Border Policy Report. (2008). Texas Law — The University of Texas School of Law. https://law.utexas.edu/humanrights/borderwall/communities/municipalities-US-Mexico-Border-Policy-Report.pdf
Leave a Reply