For the objectives of this research, healthcare inequalities are imbalances in the achievement of maximum health capacity that can be assessed by variations in frequency, occurrence, death, illness severity, and other unfavorable medical problems among distinct demographic populations in the United States. While the phrase inequalities are frequently utilized or construed to refer to inequalities amongst racial or cultural populations, inequalities can arise in a variety of other aspects, including sexuality, sexual preference, age, handicap condition, financial position, and geographical position. In combination with color and nationality, all of these elements impact a person’s potential to reach maximum wellness, as per Healthy People 2030 (Healthy People 2030, 2016). Furthermore, current information on health inequalities shows that medical results vary between and within all of the abovementioned demographic groupings.
Medical disparities can result from health imbalances, which are systemic discrepancies in the wellbeing of individuals and populations in unstable social situations that are preventable and unfair. These are the kinds of inequities that the report’s mandate reflects, and which will be discussed in the rest of this research. In the United States, women of color have extremely inadequate maternity medical results, notably unacceptably significant incidence of mortality during gestation or delivery. Both socio-cultural and health-care system variables make a significant contribution to rising percentages of inadequate medical consequences and maternal deaths among Black women, who are more likely to encounter obstacles to adequate treatment and are frequently subjected to racial prejudice all through their lifetimes. The purpose of this article is to explore health disparity amongst women of color in accessing medical services, their implications as well as various measures to enhance equity in the healthcare system.
There are many factors that contribute to disparities among women of color in the United States. Access to treatment, inadequate effectiveness of treatment, societal characteristics (e.g., insufficient availability to healthful meals, deprivation, constrained individual assistance structures, and victimization), ecological circumstances, linguistic hurdles, and health tendencies are all factors that relate to health imbalances among women of color in the US. Sociological wellness factors are the cultural and ecological situations in which individuals reside, study, operate, and enjoy. Women of color are subjected to low incomes, while most of them reside in remote societies where they are frequently excessively subjected to factors and surroundings that adversely impact wellness dangers and consequences and contribute to increased incidences of health inequalities. Women of color residing in remote locations, for instance, are higher prone than their metropolitan colleagues to suffer from accidental incidents, heart diseases, cancers, dementia, and persistent diseases (Mandal, 2019).
Moreover, women of color are subjected to limited monetary assets. For numerous women of color, a shortage of adequate cash is a hurdle to treatment, but accessibility to medical care is especially limited amongst minority groups. Women of color are frequently assigned a health coverage program that restricts the range of treatments and practitioners accessible to them. Also, political factors contribute to the poor accessibility of medical services of women of color. Actions undertaken by those who control healthcare practices will unavoidably be impacted by underpinning political concerns and limits. To comprehend medical policies and practices, the medical practitioners must first comprehend political variables such as party politics, citizens’ perspectives, general populace viewpoint, political ideals, principles and perception structures, the strength of engrained interest organizations, and the essence of media publicity, as well as lawful demands and organizational provisions. As a consequence, the political parties may end up passing medical laws and policies, which affects the medical practitioners as well as hindering the women of color from accessing medical attention.
The implications of insufficient access to medical services among women of color are unsurprising. Untreated physiological problems can severely worsen, and because physiological illnesses frequently accompany psychological medical problems, comorbidity problems are likely to occur. Furthermore, psychological health disorders are frequently coupled with physiological conditions due to negligence, such as dehydration, inappropriate prescription doses, or severe medical consequences, which may necessitate immediate medical intervention. The possible medical consequences of limited accessibility to medical services include poor persistent illness treatment, a higher burden from avoidable illnesses and impairment, and early mortality. Women of color experience greater incidences of disease and mortality across a spectrum of health issues, reducing the country’s general health. According to studies, health inequities are expensive. According to the analysis, the differences equate to nearly $92 billion in excessive health care expenses and $41 billion in lost output annually, in addition to significant financial expenditures owing to untimely fatalities (Ndugga & Artiga, 2021). As the community becomes increasingly varied, with women of color expected to represent more than half of the community by 2050, addressing inequities becomes increasingly critical. This disparity in the effects of poor access to medical services may result to perhaps more broadening medical imbalances and elevated medical dangers for the society as a whole, especially if some communities continue to be at a greater danger of infection due to reduced medication rates and/or greater threat of illness exposure.
Solution Plan
The first goal is to eliminate disparity among women of color is to include measures that guarantee institutional enhancements for all while eradicating health care inequities depending on color, religion, native languages, and wealth while designing a comprehensive medical care program that offers accessibility to excellent treatment for all United States citizens. The equity criteria presented in this presentation will be used by the United States to assess any medical care framework reform plan. The medical care framework must guarantee that cost-sharing initiatives – for instance, high pricing centered on established medical conditions or personal demands, do not disparately exclude women of color from treatment in order to make medical care inexpensive and reachable to everyone, such as underprivileged societies. Initiatives will also enhance both clinicians’ and medical care institutions’ cultural and language fluency in order to support the efficient utilization of medical care facilities and the provision of suitable treatment. In addition to these initiatives, the medical care systems will incorporate assessment measures to ensure that improvements reduce medical care disparities rather than worsen (Williams & Cooper, 2019).
In addition, irrespective of the health care coverage scheme in which women of color are registered, the United States must improve the quality of treatment that they get. Initiatives will encompass the collection of the value of treatment information segmented by racial group, nationality, main linguistic, and other attributes of underprivileged societies in order to eliminate the recorded disparities in the value of medical treatment obtained by women of color, refugee populations, and minimal-income populaces in the United States. Enhancing accessibility to elevated education will almost certainly enhance wellness. Early childhood initiatives, such as early childhood instruction and family assistance initiatives, have beneficial health outcomes and contribute to the reduction of socioeconomic disadvantaged and health inequities. Due to their ability to enhance results for both caregivers and kids, as well as to offer long-term medical and financial advantages, these treatments have the potential to generate a significant return on investments. As a result, there is growing agreement that taking a life-course approach is vital to enhancing community wellness and lowering and eradicating health inequalities.
Also, by providing equal accessibility to health care for everyone would help in eliminating disparity among women of color. Accessibility to thorough preventative tests and interventions can help to reduce and eliminate at least some health disparities. This will diminish the imbalance between whites and people of color for all ethnic communities in the United States and totally eradicate that disparity for women of color. In addition, the plan will also encompass the provision of job opportunities that provide sufficient earnings to sustain health. The plan will also incorporate civil liberties initiatives such as equitable exposure to job opportunities, the jobs and earnings benefits that will lead to increment in life expectancy. These goals will be evaluated in relation to the entire population indicated by the realm of groupings. The entire populace percentage is a weighted average of the grouping levels in a realm (the weighting of the grouping ratios is determined by the percentage of people in every grouping.). The overall populace ratio is typically the populace’s average. By addressing the abovementioned measures, I believe they will be most effective in establishing equity in medical services to women of color. This is because this population will be more educated on health matters, their rights will be observed, and also, they will be provided with equal access to health care.
However, there are challenges that hinder the change plan, such as the reduced capacity to effectively identify the amount and nature of issues due to difficulties with database and informational dependability. I was further challenged by the expanding racial and cultural diversification of the U.s. populace, the variability in wellness condition within every racial or cultural community, and the numerous variables that result in healthy or weak wellness conditions, such as socioeconomics, surroundings, schooling, customs, and other variables (Atrash, 2018).
Implementation of the proposed solution:
One of the strategies for teaching women of color on matters concerning accessibility to medical services is the use of educational technology. Client educational resources are now more easily accessible because of advances in technology. With the click of a mouse, teaching materials may be modified and published instantly for clients. In this strategy, I will ensure that the patient’s specific demands are met. Instead of simply handing the client a pile of documents to peruse, I go over them with the clients to verify that they comprehend the directions and to address any concerns that may emerge. In order to address the needs of every client, some of the learning materials are accessible in more than one language. The other strategy is to encourage the client’s interests. It is critical that clients comprehend why this plan is necessary. Establish a connection, inquire and respond to inquiries, and take into account individual client problems. Lastly, I would identify the client’s preferred learning approach. A variety of ways may yield comparable knowledge. In reality, offering instruction through several modes enhances learning. Clients study in various ways, so first is to determine whether the client studies fastest by viewing a DVD or by studying. A hands-on approach in which the clients perform a technique under supervision is frequently the best method.
One of the ways to gain funds for the implementations is to collaborate with non-governmental organizations and the world bank. In community collaboration and establishments that endorse women of color in accessing medical services, the financing now involves the society development segment, led by the world bank and financial institutions, social entrepreneurs, and others. On the other hand, in order to gain community support, I would engage people who will be impacted by the practices I am attempting to reform. This entails guaranteeing that citizens are aware of prospective repercussions of policy choices, as well as having a say in what transpires. This is a win-win situation that gives locals more influence over their surroundings while also allowing me to gather backing for policy reforms.
This plan was created to provide individuals who plan and administer community-based medical initiatives with a systematic approach to ensure that equality is integrated into intervention concepts and that its progress can be better proven and described. It is concerned with achieving equal health consequences. This plan is intended for practitioners engaging in Maternal health initiatives as well as other healthcare departments that deal with women’s treatments, particularly those financed by the world bank agency. In order for the implementation to be effective, I would present it in the public hall by use of visual aid (PowerPoint) to generate instructional images that will assist in organizing my ideas, accentuating them, and illustrating crucial ideas.
Evaluation of outcome of the proposed solution:
One of the facts that could inform that the plan was successful is the reduced mortality rates among women of color. Also, women of color have been able to access affordable medical treatment, which has enhanced their quality of life. The plan’s success is of no doubt since physicians have prevented illness and incapacity amongst women of color, detected and cured diseases and other medical problems, reduced the probability of dying prematurely (early), and improved the average life expectancy.
I would promote cross-sector collaboration to ensure the continued success of the plan. Meaningful collaborations are required for society-based approaches to advance health parity by establishing a common purpose and goal, strengthening the society’s ability to influence consequences, and promoting cross-sector engagement. Many different parties can advocate or execute such approaches, either as leaders or as participants. Institutions with a health objective, such as local medical organizations, clinics, or nationally certified health facilities, fall into this category. Collaborators can use their distinctive abilities and assets to fill a range of capacities in society-based health equality initiatives to fight disparity among women of color, thus ensuring successful continuity of the plan (Baciu, Geller & Negussie, 2017).
One of the key factors that I would assess to make changes is the plan’s efficiency. Thus, I would interview some of the patients to compare their experiences on the medical services after the plan has been implemented. If there would be no improvement, it implies the plan needs to be changed with some of the policies being added while removing the inefficient ones. Also, I would listen to the views of the medical practitioners to identify policies included in the change plan that hinders their practices for effective service delivery. Lastly, I would assess the mortality rate amongst women of color to determine whether the plan is effective and make the necessary changes in the policies.
Conclusion
To effectively meet the demands of racial, cultural, and linguistic populations, the United States must restructure its medical care facilities. This involves strengthening governmental backing for and lowering the economic susceptibility of “safety net” health facilities, community medical institutes, and medical care organizations that serve the underprivileged and women of color. Policy alterations should also build or revitalize disparities-fighting initiatives, such as establishing rewards for medical care practitioners operating in underprivileged populations and evaluating the utilization of the Certificate of Need procedures to ensure that adjustments to healthcare services are dependent on society requirements and the decrease of racial, cultural, and linguistic medical imbalances. To achieve these infrastructural and regulatory improvements, the United States should devote funds to integrating the numerous state organizations accountable for building a holistic, national strategy to eradicate racial and ethnic health inequalities.
The overall importance of this change plan is to eradicate disparity amongst women of color and promote their access to medical services. This plan will eliminate prejudices that cause doctors to provide substandard medical care to women of color, contributing to greater levels of illness and deaths. Through this initiative, practitioners of women of color will be more likely to offer efficacious therapies to persons of color equivalent to their white counterparts. Also, this change advocates for the elimination of measures that restrict people of color from accessing medical services. It further advocates for equal opportunities for women of color; they should be charged based on their financial capabilities and that they obtain medical services irrespective of their medical coverage. With these measures, they will help eradicate disparities in the healthcare centers and promote equality despite the race or ethnicity of the individuals.
However, additional research is required on this change plan to ensure optimal service delivery to women of color. This would incorporate research on how to expand the health coverage for persons of color. Since most women of color are uninsured, they are less apt to have a frequent practitioner or receive prompt and regular treatment than insured people, and they are more apt to be admitted for avoidable diseases. Thus, increases in health care coverage are especially important for persons of color. For this activity, no additional funding will be required. However, some of the changes in the plan would include advocating for an increase in the number and capacity of practitioners for women of color. Because minority health professionals are increasingly apt than Whites to operate in minority and medically underprivileged communities, a highly diversified medical staff may aid in improving accessibility and compliance to treatments.
References
Baciu A, Geller A, & Negussie Y. (2017, January 11). Partners in promoting health equity in communities – Communities in action – NCBI bookshelf. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425859/
David R. Williams, & Lisa A. Cooper. (2019). Reducing racial inequities in health: Using what we already know to take action. PubMed Central (PMC). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406315/
Dr. Ananya Mandal. (2019, February 26). Disparities in access to health care. News-Medical.net. https://www.news-medical.net/health/Disparities-in-Access-to-Health-Care.aspx
Hani K. Atrash. (2018). Health disparities: Challenges, opportunities, and what you can do about it. Periódicos Eletrônicos em Psicologia. https://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-12822018000300002
Healthy people 2030. (2016). https://health.gov/healthypeople
Nambi Ndugga, & Samantha Artiga. (2021, May 11). Disparities in health and health care: 5 key questions and answers. KFF. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/disparities-in-health-and-health-care-5-key-question-and-answers/
Leave a Reply