Identify an assessment/diagnosis instrument: Brown Anti-Deficit Disorder Scales (BADDS)
Appraise a scholarly, peer-reviewed article that addresses the use of the instrument to support your choice as an evidence-based instrument for practice: Improved executive function in adults diagnosed with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder as measured by the Brown attention-deficit disorder scale following treatment with SHP465 mixed amphetamine salts extended-release: Post hoc analyses from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled studies
Evaluate the instrument’s appropriateness for diagnosing the condition it is designed to assess or if the developers of the instrument reported that the instrument is only part of a comprehensive assessment for the order: The BADDS are two 40-item self-report scales that are used to assess the signs of Anti-Deficit Hypersensitive Disorder (ADHHD). One of the BADDS kits is designed for children and adolescents, while the other kit is designed for adolescents and adults. One of these scales was developed and evaluated for usage in individuals aged 12 and 18. The other scale was developed and evaluated for use in individuals aged 18 and above. BADDS has been utilized in various research findings of adults and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD to assess the impacts of ADHD drug therapy on executive function.
Describe whether or not the instrument can be used to measure patient response to therapy/treatment or if it is strictly for assessment and diagnosis: Brown Anti-Deficit Disorder Scales is not only utilized to preliminary test individuals believed of having ADHD, and in thorough diagnostic evaluation for ADHD, it is used to supervise the efficacy of ADD therapies responses in a variety of instructional, medical, and managed healthcare environment (Rucklidge & Tannock, 2002).
Discuss the psychometrics/ scoring of the instrument, including reliability and validity: The simple READY SCORE® form provides instant cluster scores as well as a total rating denoting general disorder from a wide spectrum of ADD signs. T scores imply how much disorder the participant has in each grouping compared to the normative populace. The outcomes indicate whether the participant seems to have ADHD and would gain from a full ADHD assessment. For most medical metrics on these scales, a high rating (above 60) indicates minor problems, while a rating above 70 indicates more severe issues. Nevertheless, these explanations differ between tests because each uses its own categorizations and ranges.
Discuss any limitations associated with the use of the instrument.
Despite the Brown Anti-Deficit Disorder Scales being effective in screening ADHD, it has limitations. The medical practitioners may utilize distinct subjective metrics to describe symptoms and may not consider the framework of symptoms when appraising them (Thomas, 2001).
References
Thomas E. Brown, Brigitte Robertson, & Jie Chen. (2020, November 5). Improved executive function in adults diagnosed with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder as measured by the Brown attention-deficit disorder scale following treatment with SHP465 mixed amphetamine salts extended-release: Post hoc analyses from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled studies – Thomas E. Brown, Jie Chen, Brigitte Robertson, 2022. SAGE Journals. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1087054720961819
J J Rucklidge, & R Tannock. (2002, January). Validity of the Brown ADD scales: an investigation in a predominantly inattentive ADHD adolescent sample with and without reading disabilities. PubMed. DOI: 10.1177/108705470200500303
Thomas E. Brown, PhD. (2001). Brown attention-deficit disorder scales. Pearson Assessments.
Leave a Reply