In a short written response of at least 300 words, reflect on this question, \”How could Swinburnian methodology be used in a conversation where you are sharing your faith with a stranger?\”
According to Swinburnian methodology, faith, particularly in Christianity, can be considered rational and coherent, particularly in a rigorous philosophical sense. When having a conversation with a stranger and sharing faith, it is important to focus mainly on the concept of propositional belief itself. Rather than describing faith in terms of relative probability, it will be important to focus on faith as an important notion related to believing so-and-so as against such-and-such. Propositional faith, in this case, must therefore be taken as mental states which allow one piece of information to be contrasted with another one, and it does not necessarily have to be in an elaborated on conscious manner. Probability, however, will still be considered as an important and possible expression of what is involved in believing, particularly for a person who which to make probability evaluation.
The idea of faith must therefore be considered as a form of trust. It will also be important to avoid cases, conversations, or situations that may contribute to undercutting the cognitive elements related to faith. The primary focus, in this case, is to show specific beliefs that will distinguish me from other unbelievers. Comparing the creeds of different religions and, most importantly, concluding that faith-related to Christian creed is most likely to be true in this conversation is also of significant essence. This will help the stranger‘s understanding of my faith and general acceptance of the process. The revelation of Christ is also of significant help in this case[1]. Taking faith in Christianity plays a critical role in understanding the faith and, most importantly, the general process of the conversations. As such, it will improve the ability of the stranger to understand what it takes and, most importantly, the role of faith, particularly in understanding Christianity.
In a short written response of at least 300 words, reflect on this question, \”How could an evidential/historical methodology be used in a conversation where you are sharing your faith with a stranger?\”
The historical methodology focuses mainly on a process by which one gathers evidence with the primary objective of formulating specific ideas about the past. However, formulating this idea will depend significantly more examination of primary sources. Through historical and evidential methodology, it becomes easy to gain an insight into the past and propose effective and reliable theories that will be best in sharing ideas related to a specific faith. This will be achieved particularly by presenting specific ideas related to the past and particularly those that support the faith being presented. Through these events, it becomes easy and effective to understand how these past events.
The methodology allows effectiveness in the ability of a person to analyze and, most importantly, interpret these past events, thus making it effective to communicate with the stranger on specific elements or matters that support specific forms of faith and thus making it easy and effective to understand how these past events support a specific type of faith. This methodology plays a major role in giving people a better understanding and, most importantly, appreciation for specific types of narrative that supports faith[2]. The context related to the historical or evidential events will help in motivating the stranger to understand and behave as these events happened, which is critical in ensuring effectiveness and positive outcomes in the general understanding of the faith one of sharing. It will include specific events and actions that relate to the faith being shared and, most importantly, general understanding of the process and the faith involved. As a result, it ensures effectiveness in the general process of communicating matters related to faith with the stranger.
Bibliography
Porter, Steven L. “Swinburnian atonement and the doctrine of penal substitution.” Faith and Philosophy 21, no. 2 (2004): 228-241.
Tucker, Aviezer. Our knowledge of the past: A philosophy of historiography. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[1] Porter, Steven L. “Swinburnian atonement and the doctrine of penal substitution.” Faith and Philosophy 21, no. 2 (2004): 228-241.
[2] Tucker, Aviezer. Our knowledge of the past: A philosophy of historiography. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Leave a Reply