The National Intelligence Strategy (NIS) in the United States guides the country in intelligence policies. The goals of the NIS are to align the efforts of the nation’s Intelligence Community and analyze and prioritize the most crucial goals of the community. Objectives of the NIS aim to provide essential investments and resources to the Intelligence Community to maximize their efforts. The NIS also improves technological innovation to improve quality, enable strong partnerships for better security outcomes, and enhance transparency and accountability to foster good relationships and public trust (Acuff & Nowlin, 2019).
Cyber Threat Intelligence works by collecting data on different threat actors’ motives, targets, and attack behavior. Organizations and individuals use Cyber Threat Intelligence to be more proactive and take action against any imminent security threats and breaches they are exposed to. Threat intelligence reduces costs incurred during the recovery and restoration of data after a breach. Additional costs can also incur due to fines paid after lawsuits and expenses paid for investigations. An organization can end up losing its credibility and market position. Threat Intelligence is a guarantee means to reduce risks from cyber-attacks and avoid loss of important data. Threat intelligence maximizes staff and improves efficiency since the staff can concentrate on essential tasks instead of cyber-attacks. Analyzing cyber threats can help companies determine whether their available security defense systems can avoid several forms of attacks. Cyber security information can be shared with others and help them prevent attacks.
Counterterrorism counterproliferation (CTCP) is crucial to the United States government defense system. The term counterterrorism refers to the efforts made by the government to provide a framework to counteracts like violent extremism and radicalization that can lead to terrorism and enhance international cooperation and collaboration in matters related to the same. Counterproliferation refers to all efforts made by a country’s military, intelligence, and diplomacy to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and conventional weapons. The CTCP collectively adds a layer of protection to prevent threats by providing early indications of threats, locating any nuclear weapons, securing the nuclear weapons, and reducing the effects of any radiological incidents that can happen anywhere.
Counterintelligence activities gather information intending to protect individuals and organizations against any form of sabotage, espionage, assassinations by foreign governments, intelligence activities, foreign persons and organizations, and international terrorist activities. Strategy objectives of counterintelligence in the United States aim to identify possible foreign threat attacks and direct investments to ensure national security. The Counterintelligence strategy in the country also gives details about actions taken to protect the country against such threats. Counterintelligence contributes to policymaking in the United States. This national security tool provides a window that displays a foreign county’s plan, intentions, and capability.
Security intelligence refers to collecting, standardizing, and analyzing information collectively generated by applications and IT structures to improve the security infrastructure of companies and organizations. The government of the nation can use this information to make security and defense policies. Counterintelligence in the country works by identifying foreign intelligence activities against the nation, analyzing the activities of these foreign countries, and neutralizing any form of foreign intelligence action that poses a threat to the country’s security. Security intelligence is important in threat detection to ensure a positive response. Security operations are also more simplified with the use of cutting-edge SIEM tools and reducing costs.
References
Acuff, J. M., & Nowlin, M. J. (2019). Competitive intelligence and national intelligence estimates. Intelligence and National Security, 34(5), 654-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2019.1592839
Leave a Reply